satu perkara. Satu perkara lagi yang ditimbulkannya ialah: beberapa
projek yang telah diumumkan atau dilancarkan oleh pimpinan dulu, seperti
Lebuhraya Rakyat dan Stadium baru, tidak nampak pun kemajuannya. Yakni:
Dr Agus tidak nampak kemajuannya.
(Saya teringat kepada
puak-puak yang menentang Morsi di Mesir, dengan memberi alasan tidak
nampak kemajuan dilakukan Morsi untuk memulihkan ekonomi Mesir setelah
setahun memimpin kerajaan. Maka itu mewajarkan kudeta. Bezanya Dr Agus
mempersoalkan pimpinan Ustaz/Datuk Ahmad Yaakob di Kelantan itu setelah
100 hari memimpin.)
Jadi hal itu kuranglah menarik bagi saya.
Dalam tempoh 100 hari itu kenapakah mesti dilihat pada perkara-perkara
seperti itu? Dr Agus mengiranya penting maka dia hendak melihatnya – itu
hak dialah. Tapi saya menganggapnya tidaklah penting. Begitu juga
dengan hal kambing Jamnapari itu. Tapi tak mengapalah. Biarkanlah!
kepada persoalan yang menarik di atas tadi. Bahawa kepimpinan baru
mestilah ada idea baru. Seperti Najib apabila jadi Perdana Menteri dia
kemukakan idea 1Malaysia; Abdullah Ahmad Badawi apabila jadi Perdana
Menteri dia kemukakan idea Islam Hadhari; (dengan segala pembaziran dan
penyelewengan wang, tenaga dan masa bersama dengannya). Ustaz Ahmad
Yaakob apabila jadi Menteri Besar menggantikan Nik Abdul Aziz, apa idea
Persoalan saya – kenapa mesti ada idea baru seperti itu?
Atau kenapa mesti ada keghairahan baru seperti yang dikatakan oleh Dr
Agus itu? Tak bolehkah kalau Ustaz Ahmad Yaakob mengatakan dia akan
meneruskan pelaksanaan dasar dan perjuangan “Membangun Bersama Islam”
berprinsipkan ‘Ubudiyah, Mas’uliyah dan Itqan (UMI) seperti yang telah
diasaskan oleh pimpinan Tok Guru Nik Abdul Aziz?
While the Court of Appeal last Friday detailed the non-calling of Najib Abdul Razak's aide-de-camp DSP Musa Safri as a factor in acquitting the two Special Action Unit officers, the written judgment also states that the second accused, Sirul Azhar Umar, could have been framed.
Sirul Azhar in his testimony from the dock had described how he had been made "a scapegoat" by the police, to be sacrificed in order to protect their plans.
the written judgment released today, Court of Appeal judge Tengku
Maimum Tuan Mat described why it was unsafe to accept the evidence from
the police officers who went to Sirul Azhar's Kota Damansara home.
is thus a conflicting and inconclusive account of events as regards
the discovery of the black jacket and (Altantuya Shaariibuu's
jewellery). There is also no conclusive account of what exactly was
said by Sirul as regards the jacket.
Justice Tengku Maimum said
according to one of the police witnesses, ASP Zulkarnain Hassan, Sirul
Azhar had told him he kept the items (jewellery) in the jacket, but the
testimony of another officer did not disclose any such statement being
The judge said Sirul Azhar had contended that one of the
police officers, who said the jewellery was kept in the black jacket,
had asked the accused (Sirul Azhar) to hold the jacket for the purpose
of him being photographed with it, twice.
"The same officer took
out some items from inside the same jacket and placed them on the bed
before forcing him (Sirul Azhar) to point, by his finger, at all those
items again for his pictures to be taken.
"The second appellant
is thus saying that the police had planted the jewellery in his house.
Relevant to this issue is the fact that the keys to the house were in
the possession of the police prior to the search for the black jacket
from inside the unlocked cupboard in Sirul's unlocked room," Justice
Tengku Maimum said.
Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azhar were discharged and acquitted last Friday, after the Court of Appeal ruled there were serious misdirections by the court.
appellate court also contrasted the evidence of Zulkarnain and the
other officer who were in Sirul Azhar’s house and noted conflicting and
inconclusive accounts of events with regard to the discovery of the
black jacket and jewellery.
Justice Tengku Maimun said the
trial-within-a-trial version conducted to determine this supported Sirul
Azhar’s version that it was Zulkarnain who had directed him to show
Conflicting police reports